<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="RSS_xslt_style.asp" version="1.0" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:WebWizForums="http://syndication.webwizguide.com/rss_namespace/">
 <channel>
  <title>Proclass Forum</title>
  <link>http://forum.proclass.org.uk/</link>
  <description>This is an XML content feed of; Proclass Forum : Last 10 Posts</description>
  <copyright>Copyright (c) 2006-2008 Web Wiz Forums - All Rights Reserved.</copyright>
  <pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 08:02:05 +0000</pubDate>
  <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2011 14:40:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
  <generator>Web Wiz Forums 9.08</generator>
  <ttl>30</ttl>
  <WebWizForums:feedURL>forum.proclass.org.uk/RSS_topic_feed.asp</WebWizForums:feedURL>
  
  <item>
   <title>ProClass Discussion &amp; Suggestions : Strange categories</title>
   <link>http://forum.proclass.org.uk/forum_posts.asp?TID=27&amp;PID=103#103</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://forum.proclass.org.uk/member_profile.asp?PF=5" rel="nofollow">tkashmore</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> Strange categories<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 24/Jun/2011 at 2:40pm<br /><br /><P style="MARGIN: 6pt 0cm" =Ms&#111;normal><FONT size=2 face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">If is useful from a classification point of view to try to use the most appropriate heading for expenditure. For a school purchase the ProClass top heading of ‘Education’ is a good place to start. A PA system is audio so the second level of ‘Audio Visual’ is appropriate too. I don’t see how ‘Facilities Management/‘Design &amp; Photography’ and ‘Facilities Management/Security’ can be connected in these circumstances? They are neither educational or audio related.</FONT></P>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2011 14:40:05 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://forum.proclass.org.uk/forum_posts.asp?TID=27&amp;PID=103#103</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>ProClass Discussion &amp; Suggestions : Strange categories</title>
   <link>http://forum.proclass.org.uk/forum_posts.asp?TID=27&amp;PID=102#102</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://forum.proclass.org.uk/member_profile.asp?PF=63" rel="nofollow">HPD</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> Strange categories<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 24/Jun/2011 at 2:02pm<br /><br />it's not something I would have classed under 'Education' as the main category - I would have put it in 'Facilities &amp; managed svs' (create sub: - Audio&nbsp;visual); the reason why is because 'design &amp; photography' and 'CCTV' are in there too.<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV><DIV>I don't know about other but the current doesn't make logical sense in my head, but that could just be me....</DIV><DIV>&nbsp;</DIV><DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2011 14:02:51 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://forum.proclass.org.uk/forum_posts.asp?TID=27&amp;PID=102#102</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>ProClass Discussion &amp; Suggestions : Strange categories</title>
   <link>http://forum.proclass.org.uk/forum_posts.asp?TID=27&amp;PID=101#101</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://forum.proclass.org.uk/member_profile.asp?PF=5" rel="nofollow">tkashmore</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> Strange categories<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 23/Jun/2011 at 11:09am<br /><br />We think that a PA system should be classified as:<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV><DIV>171111/Education/Audio Visual</DIV><DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2011 11:09:05 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://forum.proclass.org.uk/forum_posts.asp?TID=27&amp;PID=101#101</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>ProClass Discussion &amp; Suggestions : Strange categories</title>
   <link>http://forum.proclass.org.uk/forum_posts.asp?TID=27&amp;PID=100#100</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://forum.proclass.org.uk/member_profile.asp?PF=63" rel="nofollow">HPD</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> Strange categories<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 23/Jun/2011 at 10:48am<br /><br />another one:<DIV>a school asked for a PA system, I have classed it in <TABLE style="WIDTH: 424pt; BORDER-COLLAPSE: collapse" border=0 cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width=564 x:str><COLGROUP><COL style="WIDTH: 57pt; mso-width-source: userset; mso-width-alt: 2779" width=76><COL style="WIDTH: 203pt; mso-width-source: userset; mso-width-alt: 9874" width=270><COL style="WIDTH: 164pt; mso-width-source: userset; mso-width-alt: 7972" width=218><T><TR style="HEIGHT: 12.75pt" height=17><TD style="BORDER-BOTTOM: #e0dfe3 0.5pt; BORDER-LEFT: text 0.5pt solid; : transparent; WIDTH: 57pt; HEIGHT: 12.75pt; BORDER-TOP: #e0dfe3 0.5pt; BORDER-RIGHT: text 0.5pt solid" =xl1940 height=17 width=76 x:num><FONT size=2 face=Arial>291110</FONT></TD><TD style="BORDER-BOTTOM: #e0dfe3 0.5pt; BORDER-LEFT: text; : transparent; WIDTH: 203pt; BORDER-TOP: #e0dfe3 0.5pt; BORDER-RIGHT: text 0.5pt solid" =xl1939 width=270><FONT size=2 face=Arial>Arts &amp; Leisure Services</FONT></TD><TD style="BORDER-BOTTOM: #e0dfe3 0.5pt; BORDER-LEFT: text; : transparent; WIDTH: 164pt; BORDER-TOP: #e0dfe3 0.5pt; BORDER-RIGHT: text 0.5pt solid" =xl1938 width=218><FONT size=2 face=Arial>Professional Musical Instruments</FONT></TD></TR></T></TABLE></DIV><DIV>&nbsp;</DIV><DIV>However this category really should say: Professional Musical Instruments &amp; Equipment</DIV><DIV>&nbsp;</DIV><DIV>Just a thought though....</DIV>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2011 10:48:20 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://forum.proclass.org.uk/forum_posts.asp?TID=27&amp;PID=100#100</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>ProClass Discussion &amp; Suggestions : Strange categories</title>
   <link>http://forum.proclass.org.uk/forum_posts.asp?TID=27&amp;PID=99#99</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://forum.proclass.org.uk/member_profile.asp?PF=5" rel="nofollow">tkashmore</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> Strange categories<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 16/Jun/2011 at 11:14am<br /><br /><P style="MARGIN: 6pt 0cm" =Ms&#111;normal><SPAN style="LINE-HEIGHT: 150%; FONT-SIZE: 10pt"><FONT face=Arial>Thanks for the interesting question.<?: prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" /><o:p></o:p></FONT></SPAN></P><P style="MARGIN: 6pt 0cm" =Ms&#111;normal><SPAN style="LINE-HEIGHT: 150%; FONT-SIZE: 10pt"><FONT face=Arial>We agree that chemicals should not be under Horticulture, we also think that ‘Swimming Pools’ should be in the classification, under Sports, so propose that:<o:p></o:p></FONT></SPAN></P><P style="MARGIN: 6pt 0cm" =Ms&#111;normal><SPAN style="LINE-HEIGHT: 150%; FONT-SIZE: 10pt"><FONT face=Arial>‘Sports &amp; Playground Equipment &amp; Maintenance’ is changed to:<o:p></o:p></FONT></SPAN></P><P style="MARGIN: 6pt 0cm" =Ms&#111;normal><SPAN style="LINE-HEIGHT: 150%; FONT-SIZE: 10pt"><FONT face=Arial>‘Sports, Playground Equipment &amp; Swimming Pools &amp; Maintenance’<o:p></o:p></FONT></SPAN></P><P style="MARGIN: 6pt 0cm" =Ms&#111;normal><SPAN style="LINE-HEIGHT: 150%; FONT-SIZE: 10pt"><FONT face=Arial>With ‘Swimming Pool Equipment’ &amp; Swimming Poole Maintenance’ (products &amp; service) added. The chemicals could go under maintenance products.<o:p></o:p></FONT></SPAN></P><P style="MARGIN: 6pt 0cm" =Ms&#111;normal><SPAN style="LINE-HEIGHT: 150%; FONT-SIZE: 10pt"><FONT face=Arial>We further think that ‘Horticultural/Weed Control’ should be changed to:<o:p></o:p></FONT></SPAN></P><P style="MARGIN: 6pt 0cm" =Ms&#111;normal><SPAN style="LINE-HEIGHT: 150%; FONT-SIZE: 10pt"><FONT face=Arial>‘Horticultural/Treatments/Weed Control’ and ‘Horticultural/Treatments/Fertilizers’ should be added.<o:p></o:p></FONT></SPAN></P><P style="MARGIN: 6pt 0cm" =Ms&#111;normal><SPAN style="LINE-HEIGHT: 150%; FONT-SIZE: 10pt"><FONT face=Arial>This means we would remove ‘Chemicals’ from ‘Horticultural’ altogether but are not sure if it should go elsewhere?<o:p></o:p></FONT></SPAN></P><P style="MARGIN: 6pt 0cm" =Ms&#111;normal><SPAN style="LINE-HEIGHT: 150%; FONT-SIZE: 10pt"><FONT face=Arial>Currently we think that:<o:p></o:p></FONT></SPAN></P><P style="MARGIN: 6pt 0cm" =Ms&#111;normal><SPAN style="LINE-HEIGHT: 150%; FONT-SIZE: 10pt"><FONT face=Arial>‘Environmental Services/Technical Equipment/Laboratory’ <o:p></o:p></FONT></SPAN></P><P style="MARGIN: 6pt 0cm" =Ms&#111;normal><SPAN style="LINE-HEIGHT: 150%; FONT-SIZE: 10pt"><FONT face=Arial>‘Environmental Services/Technical Equipment/Measuring’<o:p></o:p></FONT></SPAN></P><P style="MARGIN: 6pt 0cm" =Ms&#111;normal><SPAN style="LINE-HEIGHT: 150%; FONT-SIZE: 10pt"><FONT face=Arial>‘Environmental Services/Technical Equipment/Testing’<o:p></o:p></FONT></SPAN></P><P style="MARGIN: 6pt 0cm" =Ms&#111;normal><SPAN style="LINE-HEIGHT: 150%; FONT-SIZE: 10pt"><FONT face=Arial>probably covers calibration etc. reasonably well, although we invite other opinions.<o:p></o:p></FONT></SPAN></P><P style="MARGIN: 6pt 0cm" =Ms&#111;normal><SPAN style="LINE-HEIGHT: 150%; FONT-SIZE: 10pt"><FONT face=Arial>The next version of ProClass which will be vC11.1 should released in November this year so these changes will take effect then, if they are agreed.<o:p></o:p></FONT></SPAN></P><P>&nbsp;</P>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2011 11:14:03 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://forum.proclass.org.uk/forum_posts.asp?TID=27&amp;PID=99#99</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>ProClass Discussion &amp; Suggestions : Strange categories</title>
   <link>http://forum.proclass.org.uk/forum_posts.asp?TID=27&amp;PID=98#98</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://forum.proclass.org.uk/member_profile.asp?PF=63" rel="nofollow">HPD</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> Strange categories<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 15/Jun/2011 at 2:59pm<br /><br />Working for a council brings up strange ones....<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV><DIV>Chemicals for the local swimming pool -&gt; chemicals can only be put in 2410000 -&nbsp;Horticultural - Chemicals. Which I find, to be honest, as bit odd</DIV><DIV>&nbsp;</DIV><DIV>Chemicals are not only used in horticultural....</DIV><DIV>&nbsp;</DIV><DIV>another one: calibration of weights and measures for trading standards -&gt; I can only guess but I've put it in 181811 - Environmental Svs, Technical Equipment, Measuring</DIV><DIV>&nbsp;</DIV><DIV>I do miss a category which covers calibration; either of weights and measures or even equipment (Fluke meters, decibel meters, etc)</DIV><DIV>&nbsp;</DIV><DIV>Cheers</DIV><DIV>HPD</DIV>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 14:59:18 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://forum.proclass.org.uk/forum_posts.asp?TID=27&amp;PID=98#98</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>ProClass Discussion &amp; Suggestions : Government bodies</title>
   <link>http://forum.proclass.org.uk/forum_posts.asp?TID=26&amp;PID=97#97</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://forum.proclass.org.uk/member_profile.asp?PF=63" rel="nofollow">HPD</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> Government bodies<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 08/Jun/2011 at 4:11pm<br /><br />Thank you it definitely makes the discussion internally a lot easier.<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV><DIV>We are setting up product code linked to proclass; so wehn someone buys a product/service from a supplier they have to include a product code to ensure the correct proclass by line item.</DIV>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2011 16:11:43 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://forum.proclass.org.uk/forum_posts.asp?TID=26&amp;PID=97#97</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>ProClass Discussion &amp; Suggestions : Government bodies</title>
   <link>http://forum.proclass.org.uk/forum_posts.asp?TID=26&amp;PID=96#96</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://forum.proclass.org.uk/member_profile.asp?PF=5" rel="nofollow">tkashmore</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> Government bodies<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 08/Jun/2011 at 3:17pm<br /><br /><P style="TEXT-ALIGN: justify; MARGIN: 5pt 0.75pt"><SPAN style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Verdana','sans-serif'; COLOR: black; FONT-SIZE: 9pt; mso-ansi-: EN" lang=EN>The </SPAN><SPAN style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Verdana','sans-serif'; COLOR: black; FONT-SIZE: 9pt">ProClass</SPAN><SPAN style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Verdana','sans-serif'; COLOR: black; FONT-SIZE: 9pt; mso-ansi-: EN" lang=EN> headings are for classifying the product or service being purchased. They are not meant for classifying the supplier or the council department it is being purchased for. Therefore if the service is training, the correct </SPAN><SPAN style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Verdana','sans-serif'; COLOR: black; FONT-SIZE: 9pt">ProClass</SPAN><SPAN style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Verdana','sans-serif'; COLOR: black; FONT-SIZE: 9pt; mso-ansi-: EN"> <SPAN lang=EN>heading is 261500/Human Resources/Training &amp; Conferences<?: prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" /><o:p></o:p></SPAN></SPAN></P><P style="TEXT-ALIGN: justify; MARGIN: 5pt 0.75pt"><SPAN style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Verdana','sans-serif'; COLOR: black; FONT-SIZE: 9pt; mso-ansi-: EN" lang=EN>This can be confusing when suppliers are classified by </SPAN><SPAN style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Verdana','sans-serif'; COLOR: black; FONT-SIZE: 9pt">ProClass</SPAN><SPAN style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Verdana','sans-serif'; COLOR: black; FONT-SIZE: 9pt; mso-ansi-: EN"> <SPAN lang=EN>in a contracts database, but </SPAN></SPAN><SPAN style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Verdana','sans-serif'; COLOR: black; FONT-SIZE: 9pt">obviously</SPAN><SPAN style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Verdana','sans-serif'; COLOR: black; FONT-SIZE: 9pt; mso-ansi-: EN" lang=EN> some suppliers supply many types of products and services and need to be given a main classification if the system only allows one heading. However when spend is being classified it is always based on the product or service is being purchased.</SPAN></P><P>&nbsp;</P>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2011 15:17:06 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://forum.proclass.org.uk/forum_posts.asp?TID=26&amp;PID=96#96</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>ProClass Discussion &amp; Suggestions : Government bodies</title>
   <link>http://forum.proclass.org.uk/forum_posts.asp?TID=26&amp;PID=95#95</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://forum.proclass.org.uk/member_profile.asp?PF=63" rel="nofollow">HPD</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> Government bodies<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 08/Jun/2011 at 1:35pm<br /><br />Hi<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV><DIV>just joined </DIV><DIV>&nbsp;</DIV><DIV>this morning I had a request to do the proclass coding for the Serious <EM>Organised Crime Agency (SOCA)</EM></DIV><DIV>&nbsp;</DIV><DIV>We had a little discussion here at the Council and could not find any proclass for this, BUT for this particular request it was regarding Training so (for now) this agency is under 170000 Education</DIV><DIV>&nbsp;</DIV><DIV>Is or should there be a classification level for Government services?</DIV><DIV>&nbsp;</DIV><DIV>The main question that arises here frequently is how should we class?</DIV><DIV>1) nature of the company</DIV><DIV>2) product(s)/service(s) the company provides</DIV><DIV>3) destination within Council (department)</DIV><DIV>&nbsp;</DIV><DIV>Cheers</DIV>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2011 13:35:39 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://forum.proclass.org.uk/forum_posts.asp?TID=26&amp;PID=95#95</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>ProClass Discussion &amp; Suggestions : ProClass vC10.2 draft</title>
   <link>http://forum.proclass.org.uk/forum_posts.asp?TID=25&amp;PID=94#94</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://forum.proclass.org.uk/member_profile.asp?PF=4" rel="nofollow">Jeff</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> ProClass vC10.2 draft<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 03/Nov/2010 at 10:03am<br /><br />The draft of ProClass vC10.2 has now been finalised and presented to the ProClass Board for approval.&nbsp; The hierarchy and a summary of changes/additions may be downloaded <a href="http://forum.proclass.org.uk/call/ProClass_vC10.2_draft.xls" target="_blank">here</a>.<br><br>Any comments are welcome.<br>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Nov 2010 10:03:08 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://forum.proclass.org.uk/forum_posts.asp?TID=25&amp;PID=94#94</guid>
  </item> 
 </channel>
</rss>
